Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Obstructs Justice, Threatens Police Chief With ‘Consequences’ [VIDEO]

While Democrats and their talking head comrades in the Democrat Media Complex shout “Obstruction of Justice!” over President Donald Trump’s firing of FBI Director James Comey with no evidence, a video has surfaced of a clear, irrefutable case of obstruction of justice that should be the headline story in newspapers all across America.

In the video below, disgraced former DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz actually threatens U.S. Capitol Police Chief Matthew Verderosa with “consequences” for not turning over congressional computer equipment obtained in the criminal investigation of five Pakistani former technology aides to dozens of House Democrats who were given access to members’ emails and confidential files, and received a whopping $4 million from Democrat representatives for their efforts.

“If the equipment belongs to the member, it has been lost — they say it’s been lost and it’s been identified as that members’ and the Capitol Police is supposed to return it, correct?” Wasserman Schultz asked the police chief in the annual police budget hearing on May 18. Congress is responsible for overseeing and funding the DC police as a federal law enforcement agency.

Congress is responsible for overseeing and funding the DC police as a federal law enforcement agency, so in essence, this is a boss-employee relationship.

“I can’t give you a yes or no answer on that ’cause I know…” Verderosa began to answer before Wasserman Schultz rudely cut him off.

“It’s a yes or no answer,” she interrupted. “If a member loses the equipment and it is found by the Capitol Police or your staff and it is identified as that member’s equipment, and the member is not associated with any case, and that is their equipment, it is supposed to be returned, yes or no?” she badgered.

“It depends on the circumstances,” DC Police Chief Matthew Verderosa answered before being cut off again by the clearly angry Wasserman Schultz.

“I don’t understand how that’s possible,” she blurted. “Members’ equipment is members’ equipment. It is not — it is my understanding the Capitol Police is not able to confiscate members’ equipment when the member is not under investigation. It is their equipment and it is supposed to be returned.” Wasserman Schultz argued.

“Well, I think there are extenuating circumstances in this case. And I think that through my counsel and necessary personnel, if that, in fact, is the case, with the permission of — through the investigation, we’ll return the equipment,” the police chief informed the leftist Democrat. “But until that’s accomplished, I can’t return the equipment.”

Wasserman Schultz didn’t like that answer one bit and tried to strongarm the police chief by threatening him with “consequences,” which begs the question, what is Debbie Wasserman Schultz hiding and why is she impeding on this investigation?

“I think you’re violating the rules when you conduct your business that way,” she warned. “And you should expect that there will be consequences,” Wasserman Schultz threatened.

The criminal investigation includes Imran Awan, his brothers Abid and Jamal, and two others who provided IT services for Democrats on the House intelligence, foreign affairs, and homeland security committees. Their positions gave the five under investigation access to “everything” in the employing members’ IT systems, including their email and office documents, the Daily Caller reported.

One of the criminal suspects in the Democrat IT scandal has abruptly fled the country and is now under government protection in Pakistan. House IT aides fear suspects in the security breach could be blackmailing Democrats with their own data, a valid concern considering how badly Wasserman Schultz is trying to squelch the investigation.

The media is interested in looking at “obstruction of justice” cases, I recommend they start here. But they won’t because Debbie Wasserman Schultz has a “D” next to her name and they get to play by a different set of rules.

About the Author

Matthew K. Burke
Matthew K. Burke
A former Washington State U.S. Congressional candidate in 2010, Matthew attended the nation’s first modern day Tea Party in 2009 in Seattle, Washington. He also began writing and blogging that year. Matthew became a Certified Financial Planner in 1995 and was a Financial Advisor for 24 years in his previous life. Matthew was one of the three main writers leading a conservative news site to be one of the top 15 conservative news sites in the U.S. in a matter of months. He brings to PolitiStick a vast amount of knowledge about economics as well as a passion and commitment to the vision that our Founding Fathers had for our Republic.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Sorry. No data so far.

Send this to a friend